stakeholder · SH11
Democratic institutions (unelected policy power)
Top evidence
Judge Rules DOD Unlawfully Retaliated Against Anthropic
Electronic Frontier Foundation
A federal judge ruled that the Department of Defense unlawfully retaliated against AI company Anthropic for refusing to allow its technology to be used for mass surveillance of U.S. persons. This incident highlights the tension between military applications of AI and corporate ethical red lines regarding privacy and surveillance.
How Policymakers Can Address AI Auditing and Assessment Requirements
Center for Democracy & Technology
Policymakers are increasingly considering third-party AI auditing and assessment requirements, but face challenges due to the diversity of AI models, lack of clear technical standards, and the need for effective enforcement. This highlights the ongoing effort to establish robust oversight mechanisms for AI systems.
AI Now’s Co-Executive Director Amba Kak Testifies Before Monopoly Busters Caucus
AI Now Institute
AI Now's Co-Executive Director testified before the Monopoly Busters Caucus, addressing concerns about Big Tech's monopolization of AI and its use for surveillance. The hearing aimed to explore strategies for democratic oversight and preventing the concentration of AI power and its associated privacy risks.
Researchers observe first ‘near-autonomous’ AI attack on government target in Taiwan
AI Incident Database
Suspected Chinese hackers used open-source AI models to launch a "near-autonomous" cyberattack against the Taiwanese government, marking the first publicly known instance of an AI-driven hack targeting a state entity. This incident demonstrates the escalating threat of AI systems acting as independent cyberattack agents, capable of sophisticated and rapid assaults.
DPP urges investigation of AI video mimicking Lai
AI Incident Database
A political promotional video in Taiwan allegedly used AI to mimic President William Lai's voice, criticizing the government, which led to a judicial investigation and calls for deepfake legislation. This incident highlights the critical risk of AI-amplified disinformation and the unauthorized appropriation of identity, particularly in political contexts, threatening democratic processes and public trust.